New Jersey Takes Nazi-name Kids
January 15th, 2009
New Jersey authorities have taken custody of three siblings with Nazi-like names but declined to discuss the reason the children were removed. The state Division of Youth and Family Services removed the trio – 3-year-old Adolf Hitler Campbell, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell -from their home on Tuesday. Family Services would not elaborate on the reason for taking the children, saying they do not comment on specific cases. Last month, the parents grabbed headlines when a bakery refused to put the Nazi names on their children’s birthday cake.
RSS Feed
Newsletter



seschris – Obviously you have a deep seated need to have the last word, it makes you feel like some kind of victor. The only thing you have done is shown your inability to own up to an ignorant statement. Playing into the stereotype of black people being unable to address an issue head on and instead playing little games of deflection and blame.
“Oh and my opinion remains the same…Not every one should be parents. It’s a privilege NOT a right!
LMAO!”
Look at you, like a little child, determined to get the last word, even if that word is “nananana.”
We get it, seschris. You think parenthood is a privilige and you don’t have to explain why. You have made many posts making that clear. But you’re mistaken if you think that any intelligent person reading this can’t see right through your charade.
freedom just cause you don’t understand what seschris is saying dosen’t mean it’s stupid or they’re wrong. maybe you need to look at the question harder
You people raise your kids great.
Your kids are raised great , you people.
Well ,well and how are your kids raised you people.
Freedom,
Grow up man. Just grow up!
FREEDOM SHUT THE HELL UP. THIS IS JUST A BLOG SITE NOT A DAM DEBATE. GO TO BED SOMEWHERE.
THE PARENTS SHUD B GASED!
THE PARENTS SHUD B GASED!
DAVID, AND SESCHRIS MUST REALLY BE OBSESSED WITH BLACK PEOPLE. IF ANYONE NOTICE THEY SPEND MORE TIME ON THIS WEBSITE THAN BLACKS DO. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH ANY RCAE OF POEPLE BEING ON THIS WEBSITE, BUT WHEN YOU COME ON TO PLAY THERE GOT TO BE A PERSONAL ISSUE YOU HAVE WITH YOURSELVES.
KELLY/freedom:
Don’t compare me to david I am not a racist idiot. I do however have the right to blog whereever I want just like you.
Kelly aparently you have the wrong imformation on Seschris, she is a very
proud and confident lady, and has a right to blog just like you and I……
This whole thread is infinitely ridiculous. I thought I might read some intelligent commentary (or at the very least, amusing) regarding this story. Instead, I happen upon a sparring match. I have to say, I agree with freedom here (with the exception of bringing the non-issue of race into the equation). If you make an ambiguous statement like “it’s a privilege, NOT a right” and someone makes conclusions about it that are incorrect (which, in asking if the government was responsible for granting the right, would have been my conclusion also), then it’s your fault for not explaining yourself. Granted, you don’t have to, seschris, that is very clear. But, if it were me, I would have understood that freedom wasn’t trying to goad me into some awful conversation, but rather that he or she was trying to enter a healthy debate in a public forum. I would have explained that I believed god grants the privilege, and that maybe (since your point, seschris, is that not all people should be granted the privilege) god is fallible in this instance.
My point is, if you really didn’t want to be “bullied into submission,” you probably shouldn’t have continued to reply to freedom’s responses. In that alone, freedom won: he or she got you to respond (thought not in the way they wanted) to their (in truth, valid) questions.
word,
I will tell you the same thing I told your pal freedom. I stated my opinion and I don’t owe ANYONE an explanation. There was no winner because this was not a competition it was a silly argument that I engaged in because I wanted to not because I was forced to. BTW: Your interpretation of my opinion in WRONG as well!
now i see, okay, seschris is a woman and word and freedom are probably aggressive and demanding men who like to get thier way. speaking as a free thinker I too followed this thread and while I didn’t see why seschris kept indulting this freedom creep I began to see that seschris was playing with freedom while at the same time refusing to give in to his demands. so actually word you are wrong just like freedom. seschris was not fighting responding she was fighting for her right to decide whether to explain her opinion or not. people post their personal opinions without explanation all day long on here and no one grills them so why was this time different? freedom had some personal junk going on with it i think. i also think seschris won cause she never backed down and she still didn’t answer freedom’s question which was offensive to begin with. men don’t mess with the female mind cause yall outcha league. Holla
We are free to name our kids what we desire. Enough said!
Out of all the garbage, oops, I mean verbiage that has been written Magyarjoe and maybe one or two others has made the most valid point; we are free to name our children what we want or desire. Freedom and Sechris thank you for entertaining me this morning.
lexapro online – lexapro cipro – cipro order celebrex – celebrex buy nexium online – nexium butalbital online – butalbital buy doxycycline online – doxycycline order codeine – codeine valtrex online – valtrex buy zoloft online – zoloft clomid online – clomid
order ambien – ambien buy diazepam – diazepam wellbutrin online – wellbutrin buy alprazolam online – alprazolam buy prozac online – prozac order tamiflu – tamiflu lorazepam – lorazepam buy nexium – nexium buy zoloft – zoloft klonopin online – klonopin