Therefore he killed the highest political leaders of the Hutu´s to get rid of the Tutsi clans which stayed in Ruanda and were in his opinion not loyal enough to the Tutsi system of ruling, and to have a reason to invade Ruanda with the help of the U.S. (under Bill Clinton, who seems to be very popular among blacks in the U.S.) .
It were Blacks killing Blacks, not french killing blacks, o.k..
And the Tutsi were supported by the U.S. because they assured the U.S. to protect their interests in this (ressource-rich part of the world).
That´s U.S. foreign policy, my friends (Latin America can sing you a song about U.S. foreign policy)
I don´t believe the accusations of the government of Ruanda towards France.
I´m just telling you because I read a lot hate out of your comment, and I can´t accept that because it´s hate caused by false accusations.

Part 3.2:
Now I rephrase the last part of my comment:
Kagame commanded his troops to shoot down the plane with the two presidents inside.
Because the Hutu (not french) reaction would be the killing of uncomfortable Tutsi clans (from the sight of Kagame) and this in turn would be the pretext to conquer Ruanda back from the hutu´s.
I don´t believe the accusations of the government of Ruanda towards France.
I´m just telling you because I read a lot hate out of your comment, and I can´t accept that because it´s hate caused by false accusations.
P.S. Ask yourself why the U.S. supported (and still supports) Kagame and why the U.N security council did not do anything to foreclose or stop this genozide.

if you don´t want hear anything about the background, then ignore me / my last part